Role of breast ultrasound in assessment of women with breast pain

Authors

  • Zena. M. Al hindawi Department of Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq.
  • Hussain. J. Alsalami Al-Hussain Medical City, Directory of Health, Kerbala, Iraq.
  • Alaa. S. Alattabi Department of Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq.

Keywords:

mastodynia, ultrasonography, women, Iraq

Abstract

Objective To evaluate women with breast pain whether focal or diffuse pain with or without a palpable lump with no history of breast cancer by using ultrasonography.
Methods This prospective study included 90 women with mean age of 32.89, standard deviation 8.378 (ranging between 18 and 50 years old) had been enrolled outpatient clinic from September 2016 to July 2017 complaining from breast pain, ethically permission had been taken from breast pain complaining women participants for ultrasonography.
Results The ultrasonographic finding evaluation of the affected breast classified into four categories normal 60%, duct dilation 26.7%, sold mass 8.9%, cystic mass 4.4%.
Conclusion The study resulted that the duct dilatation is the most common cause of mastalagia after 60% who had normal findings.

References

1. Naz N, Sohail S, Memon MA. Utility of breast imaging in mastalgia. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci. 2010;9:12–16.
2. Marrow M. The evaluation of common breast problems. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:2371–2378.
3. Yakut ZI, Kafali H, Karaoglanoglu M, Köktener A, Duvan CI. A new radiological approach to cyclic mastalgia: venous doppler ultrasound. Breast 2009;18:123–125.
4. Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA. Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:353–372.
5. Gumm R, Cunnick GH, Mokbel K. Evidence for the management of mastalgia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:681–684.
6. Hanif AM, Rasool S Abdullah MT, Khan A. Presentation, management and outcome of mastalgia. J Surg Pak. 2005;10:15–17.
7. Plu-Bureau G, Lê MG, Sitruk-Ware R, Thalabard JC. Cyclical mastalgia and breast cancer risk: results of a french cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:(1229–1231).
9. Elsie KM, Gonzaga MA, Francis B, Michael KG, Rebecca N, Rosemary BK, et al. Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of women on breast cancer and mammography at Mulago Hospital. Pan Afr Med J. 2010;5:9.
10. Singh K, Azad T, Gupta GD. The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. JK Science. 2008;10:3.
11. Akreyi HA. The role of breast ultrasound in assessing patients with mastalgia in Erbil, Iraq. Zanco J Med Sci. 2013;17:331-335.
12. Al-Sarairah JS, Al-Hiari RN. Breast pain assessment using breast ultrasound at King Hussein Medical Center in Jordan Indian J Med Res Pharamaceutial sci. 2016:31-5.
13. Khanna S, Arya NC, Khanna NN. Spectrum of benign breast disease. Indian J Surg. 1988;3:169–175.
14. Mansoor T, Ahmed A, Harris SH. Role of ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. Indian J Surg. 2002;64:499–501.
15. Smallwood JA, Guyer P, Dewbury K, Mengatti S, Herbert A, Royle GT, et al. The accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986;68:19–22.
16. Gonzaga MA. How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses? Pan Afr Med J. 2010;7:1.
17. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK. Whole–breast ultrasound imaging: four year follow–up. Radiology. 1985;157:505–507.
18. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123–134.
19. Harvey JA. Sonography of palpable breast masses. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2006;27:284–297.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-15

How to Cite

1.
Al hindawi ZM, Alsalami HJ, Alattabi AS. Role of breast ultrasound in assessment of women with breast pain. Iraq Med J [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];2(3):83-5. Available from: https://mail.iraqmedj.org/index.php/imj/article/view/445

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): Summer 2018

Section

Articles